New Forum at: forum.gta.com2009-07-23T09:34:05-04:00http://forum.gnatbox.com/
Lussumo Vanilla
Any way to VPN through GB with an iPhone?http://forum.gnatbox.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=5012009-02-12T15:18:00-05:002009-07-23T09:34:05-04:00marclallenhttp://forum.gnatbox.com/account.php?u=681
How about it? Anyone successfully done it? Thanks, Marc
Thanks,
Marc]]>
New GTA User's Forumhttp://forum.gnatbox.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=6872009-07-10T14:12:00-04:002009-07-15T14:09:02-04:00GTASupporthttp://forum.gnatbox.com/account.php?u=16
GTA New User's Forum is now available for all GTA Firewall Administrators. Forum is located at http://forum.gta.com/
Forum is located at http://forum.gta.com/]]>
New GTA Users Forum - http://forum.gta.comhttp://forum.gnatbox.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=6822009-07-10T14:11:07-04:002009-07-10T14:11:07-04:00GTASupporthttp://forum.gnatbox.com/account.php?u=16
GTA New User's Forum is now available for all GTA Firewall Administrators. Forum is located at http://forum.gta.com/
Forum is located at http://forum.gta.com/]]>
GBAuth v1.2.1 releasedhttp://forum.gnatbox.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=6772009-07-08T13:09:35-04:002009-07-08T13:09:35-04:00GTASupporthttp://forum.gnatbox.com/account.php?u=16
Global Technology Associates has released GBAuth version 1.2.1. This release is available for download from the GTA Support Center. Bug fixes in v1.2.1: * GBAuth properly maintains authentication when using one-time passwords. Administrators whose users use one time passwords should upgrade their users to GBAuth version 1.2.1. Release Notes are available at http://www.gta.com/support/showReleaseNote/?id=136. If you have any questions or concerns, please email GTA Support support@gta.com.
Bug fixes in v1.2.1:
* GBAuth properly maintains authentication when using one-time passwords.
Administrators whose users use one time passwords should upgrade their users to GBAuth version 1.2.1.
Release Notes are available at http://www.gta.com/support/showReleaseNote/?id=136.
If you have any questions or concerns, please email GTA Support support@gta.com.]]>
What am I missing with PPTPhttp://forum.gnatbox.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=6722009-06-29T16:33:23-04:002009-07-01T18:15:56-04:00leelovehttp://forum.gnatbox.com/account.php?u=364
I have not been able to find very much information about how to configure our GTA GB2000 for PPTP support. I have tried every combination I could think of and thought I understood how this works but I must be missing something. Can someone please give me an email of a working PPTP config ? Also I am trying to access the gta using OS X 10.5 PPTP and it works like a dream on a Fortigate firewall but I can not get this to work on the GTA. Lee
Can someone please give me an email of a working PPTP config ?
Also I am trying to access the gta using OS X 10.5 PPTP and it works like a dream on a Fortigate firewall but I can not get this to work on the GTA.
Lee]]>
Regular reboots with GB-800e (GB-OS 5.0.4, 2008-02-22)http://forum.gnatbox.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=2912008-04-25T09:02:00-04:002009-06-29T18:47:52-04:00nechaihttp://forum.gnatbox.com/account.php?u=371
Hi, we have a GB-800e firewall with GB-OS 5.0.4 running in our company. This firewall does regular reboots, e.g. one day reboot at 8:00 and 10:00, running 10 days without reboot, reboot again at 16:00. It's totally random for me. I have activated syslog and there is a strange entry with long dstname=OPZKb+EQVcY597gBXnDhnB in near of each reboot: ... 2008-04-23 15:57:34 Local2.Warning 10.xx.xx.xx Apr 23 15:57:34 id=firewall time="2008-04-23 13:57:34" fw="67900509" pri=4 msg="Accept persistent outbound, NAT" cat_action=pass dstname=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... ... 2008-04-23 15:57:34 Local2.Warning 10.xx.xx.xx Apr 23 15:57:34 id=firewall time="2008-04-23 13:57:34" fw="67900509" pri=4 msg="Accept persistent outbound, NAT" cat_action=pass dstname=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 2008-04-23 15:57:34 Local2.Warning 10.xx.xx.xx Apr 23 15:57:34 id=firewall time="2008-04-23 13:57:34" fw="67900509" pri=4 msg="kernel: " type=mgmt 2008-04-23 15:57:34 Local2.Warning 10.xx.xx.xx Apr 23 15:57:35 id=firewall time="2008-04-23 13:57:35" fw="67900509" pri=4 msg="kernel: proto=80/tcp src=10.xx.xx.xx srcport=3519 nat=xx.xx.xx.xx natport=3519 dst=xx.xx.xx.xx dstport=80 rule=6" type=mgmt ... 2008-04-23 15:57:35 Local2.Notice 10.xx.xx.xx Apr 23 15:57:35 id=firewall time="2008-04-23 13:57:35" fw="67900509" pri=5 msg="Accept persistent outbound, VPN" type=vpn cat_action=pass dstname=intranet proto=80/tcp src=10.xx.xx.xx srcport=2128 dst=10.x.x.xx dstport=80 rule=5 sent=2246 rcvd=780 pkts_sent=2 pkts_rcvd=2 op=GET arg=/images/icons/html_01.gif 2008-04-23 15:58:44 Daemon.Notice 10.xx.xx.xx Apr 23 15:58:44 id=firewall time="2008-04-23 13:58:44" fw="67900509" pri=5 msg="GB-800e version 5.0.4 slice 1 active" type=mgmt 2008-04-23 15:58:44 Daemon.Info 10.xx.xx.xx Apr 23 15:58:44 id=firewall time="2008-04-23 13:58:44" fw="67900509" pri=6 msg="alarm: Email not enabled." type=mgmt 2008-04-23 15:58:44 Daemon.Info 10.xx.xx.xx Apr 23 15:58:44 id=firewall time="2008-04-23 13:58:44" fw="67900509" pri=6 msg="FWCC: Not enabled" type=mgmt 2008-04-23 15:58:44 Daemon.Notice 10.xx.xx.xx Apr 23 15:58:44 id=firewall time="2008-04-23 13:58:44" fw="67900509" pri=5 msg="init: Starting NTP service" type=mgmt ... How does firewall evaluate value of dstname=? Is it done by analysing the HTTP stream? 2008-04-23 15:57:34 Local2.Warning 10.xx.xx.xx Apr 23 15:57:34 id=firewall time="2008-04-23 13:57:34" fw="67900509" pri=4 msg="Accept persistent outbound, NAT" cat_action=pass dstname=www.spiegel.de proto=80/tcp src=10.xx.xx.xx srcport=3515 nat=xx.xx.xx.xx natport=3515 dst=xx.xx.xx.xx dstport=80 rule=6 sent=456 rcvd=970 pkts_sent=1 pkts_rcvd=1 op=GET arg=/static/sys/v8/icons/ic_pfeil_inaktiv.gif Because this reboot is total random, I think it's connected with some action on computer within network. My first ieda was, that it could be a virus or trojan, that uses DNS protocol for communication. My latest idea is, that Skype calls on port 80 or 443 crashes HTTP protocol analyzer in firewall, if Skype establish a call through port 80 or 443. Firewall blocks all ports by default. There are only a few ports TCP/UDP for VPN clients and TCP 80,443 open for communication, so Skype will mainly use port 80 and 443 for communication. Update to 5.0.5 is planned for next days, but I found no information in release notes about such a problem. Any idea, why firewall does these random reboots? /nechai
we have a GB-800e firewall with GB-OS 5.0.4 running in our company. This firewall does regular reboots, e.g. one day reboot at 8:00 and 10:00, running 10 days without reboot, reboot again at 16:00.
It's totally random for me. I have activated syslog and there is a strange entry with long dstname=OPZKb+EQVcY597gBXnDhnB in near of each reboot:
How does firewall evaluate value of dstname=? Is it done by analysing the HTTP stream? 2008-04-23 15:57:34 Local2.Warning 10.xx.xx.xx Apr 23 15:57:34 id=firewall time="2008-04-23 13:57:34" fw="67900509" pri=4 msg="Accept persistent outbound, NAT" cat_action=pass dstname=www.spiegel.de proto=80/tcp src=10.xx.xx.xx srcport=3515 nat=xx.xx.xx.xx natport=3515 dst=xx.xx.xx.xx dstport=80 rule=6 sent=456 rcvd=970 pkts_sent=1 pkts_rcvd=1 op=GET arg=/static/sys/v8/icons/ic_pfeil_inaktiv.gif
Because this reboot is total random, I think it's connected with some action on computer within network. My first ieda was, that it could be a virus or trojan, that uses DNS protocol for communication.
My latest idea is, that Skype calls on port 80 or 443 crashes HTTP protocol analyzer in firewall, if Skype establish a call through port 80 or 443. Firewall blocks all ports by default. There are only a few ports TCP/UDP for VPN clients and TCP 80,443 open for communication, so Skype will mainly use port 80 and 443 for communication.
Update to 5.0.5 is planned for next days, but I found no information in release notes about such a problem.
Any idea, why firewall does these random reboots?
/nechai]]>
Access deniedhttp://forum.gnatbox.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=6672009-06-29T09:50:37-04:002009-06-29T14:54:00-04:00Truperhttp://forum.gnatbox.com/account.php?u=792
I tried to log into my account and I was using the wrong password on a GB-250. I realized my mistake, but I believe I am now locked out. Does anyone know how long I will be locked out before I can log in again with the correct password?
Does anyone know how long I will be locked out before I can log in again with the correct password?]]>
GB Commander and GTA Reporting Suite 2.1.1 releasedhttp://forum.gnatbox.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=6622009-06-23T16:11:10-04:002009-06-23T16:11:10-04:00GTASupporthttp://forum.gnatbox.com/account.php?u=16
Global Technology Associates has released GTA Reporting Suite and GB Commander v2.1.0. This release is available for download from the GTA Support Center. Bug fixes in v2.1.1 * All log message records are properly written to the Database Backend. Release Notes are available at https://www.gta.com/support/releaseNotes/. Users Guides can be download from http://www.gta.com/support/documents/. If you have any questions or concerns, please email GTA Sales, sales@gta.com or Support support@gta.com.
Bug fixes in v2.1.1
* All log message records are properly written to the Database Backend.
Release Notes are available at https://www.gta.com/support/releaseNotes/.
Users Guides can be download from http://www.gta.com/support/documents/.
If you have any questions or concerns, please email GTA Sales, sales@gta.com or Support support@gta.com.]]>
Protocol 41 tunnel? ipv6 in ipv4? Being blocked...http://forum.gnatbox.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=6572009-06-18T09:24:33-04:002009-06-18T12:26:17-04:00subfluxhttp://forum.gnatbox.com/account.php?u=787
Hi, For the first time on our network two WS2008 machines are attempting to communicate from the DMZ segment to the Private segment, via a GB800e. The call takes 30 seconds to complete - a quick check of the GB800's logs shows "proto=41" being blocked, and wireshark shows the servers trying to use ipv6 over ipv4. A quick google shows up that the servers are trying to use something along the lines of: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunnel_broker but the GB800 seems to be blocking this. I'm not using NAT in the GB800 - the Wikipedia article states that "proto-41 tunnels (direct IPv6 in IPv4) may not operate well with NATs". Is this some misconfiguration at my end? I can't see where to un-block the proto-41 tunnel - I can't see a block rule that includes this. Is this normal behaviour for a GTA firewall? It's unlikely, but perhaps they don't support this kind of traffic? Have any of you come across this before, or can offer any insight as to what I'm missing? Thanks for reading! Kenny
For the first time on our network two WS2008 machines are attempting to communicate from the DMZ segment to the Private segment, via a GB800e.
The call takes 30 seconds to complete - a quick check of the GB800's logs shows "proto=41" being blocked, and wireshark shows the servers trying to use ipv6 over ipv4.
A quick google shows up that the servers are trying to use something along the lines of: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunnel_broker but the GB800 seems to be blocking this.
I'm not using NAT in the GB800 - the Wikipedia article states that "proto-41 tunnels (direct IPv6 in IPv4) may not operate well with NATs".
Is this some misconfiguration at my end? I can't see where to un-block the proto-41 tunnel - I can't see a block rule that includes this.
Is this normal behaviour for a GTA firewall? It's unlikely, but perhaps they don't support this kind of traffic?
Have any of you come across this before, or can offer any insight as to what I'm missing?
Thanks for reading!
Kenny]]>
Console login for OS 4.0http://forum.gnatbox.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=6522009-06-13T21:43:13-04:002009-06-15T09:14:06-04:00leelovehttp://forum.gnatbox.com/account.php?u=364
I have a GB2000e and I added a rule that some how blocked my web access. I have tried to access the firewall via the console but I never get a login prompt. I believe i have the right config because when I reboot I see the GTA boot info and OS version but I don't see a login prompt. What am I doing wrong and how to do I get to the login console to make changes ? I prefer not to reset to default if I can help it.
I believe i have the right config because when I reboot I see the GTA boot info and OS version but I don't see a login prompt.
What am I doing wrong and how to do I get to the login console to make changes ?
I prefer not to reset to default if I can help it.]]>
GB Commander and Reporting Suite Release 2.1.0http://forum.gnatbox.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=6422009-05-27T15:23:06-04:002009-05-27T15:23:06-04:00GTASupporthttp://forum.gnatbox.com/account.php?u=16
Global Technology Associates has released GTA Reporting Suite and GB Commander v2.1.0. This release is available for download from the https://www.gta.com/support/center/login/ New Features in v2.1.0 * Added the ability to schedule reports * Additional Reports * Improved interface display. * Improved report query run-times. * Reports History section created, displaying the most recently run reports. * Added new icons displaying High Availability firewall relationships as master, slave, and init. * Improved start and end time selector for running reports with the addition of a dated calendar. Release Notes are available at http://www.gta.com/support/showReleaseNote/?id=131/. Users Guides can be download from http://www.gta.com/support/documents/. If you have any questions or concerns, please email GTA Sales, sales@gta.com or Support support@gta.com
New Features in v2.1.0
* Added the ability to schedule reports * Additional Reports * Improved interface display. * Improved report query run-times. * Reports History section created, displaying the most recently run reports. * Added new icons displaying High Availability firewall relationships as master, slave, and init. * Improved start and end time selector for running reports with the addition of a dated calendar.
Release Notes are available at http://www.gta.com/support/showReleaseNote/?id=131/.
Users Guides can be download from http://www.gta.com/support/documents/.
If you have any questions or concerns, please email GTA Sales, sales@gta.com or Support support@gta.com]]>
email confighttp://forum.gnatbox.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=6372009-05-27T10:56:37-04:002009-05-27T10:56:37-04:00slotzhttp://forum.gnatbox.com/account.php?u=782
Is there a doc that shows how to setup basic email for exchange? or can anyone give me the steps and areas of the firewall that need to be configured? thanks
thanks]]>
port forwardinghttp://forum.gnatbox.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=6272009-05-25T12:20:54-04:002009-05-27T10:55:29-04:00slotzhttp://forum.gnatbox.com/account.php?u=782
I need to forward port 443 to port 442. Has anyone done this before. Thank you Slotz
Slotz]]>
GB-750 Infohttp://forum.gnatbox.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=6222009-05-20T16:39:53-04:002009-05-20T20:54:51-04:00Alliedhttp://forum.gnatbox.com/account.php?u=777
I am very new to our GB750 and need to find out some information about it. I have looked everywhere with no results. I need to find out where to look on the interface to find the speed and duplex settings. I would appreciate it if anyone could point me in the right direction.
VPN Client / Windows 7http://forum.gnatbox.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=6172009-05-18T15:40:25-04:002009-05-18T15:40:25-04:00Anthonyjmhttp://forum.gnatbox.com/account.php?u=204
This is just an FYI since Windows 7 won't be released until the fall, but I just wanted to share my experience and see if anyone else had similar experiences. The VPN client seems to be hit or miss with Windows 7, depending on NIC drivers. On my home computer, Windows 7 RC 64bit, it works great. On my laptop, Windows 7 RC 32 bit, it blue screens. I tried the newest Greenbow client, 4.6 which claims to work with Windows 7, but that somehow killed my wireless NIC, Intel PRO 2200BG. After fighting with it for a few days, I rolled the system back to before I installed the client and my NIC started working again. Like I said, I believe the problem had to with the drivers for my specific NIC.
The VPN client seems to be hit or miss with Windows 7, depending on NIC drivers. On my home computer, Windows 7 RC 64bit, it works great. On my laptop, Windows 7 RC 32 bit, it blue screens. I tried the newest Greenbow client, 4.6 which claims to work with Windows 7, but that somehow killed my wireless NIC, Intel PRO 2200BG. After fighting with it for a few days, I rolled the system back to before I installed the client and my NIC started working again. Like I said, I believe the problem had to with the drivers for my specific NIC.]]>
Connecting GTA 1000 Serieshttp://forum.gnatbox.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=6122009-05-12T07:00:37-04:002009-05-12T13:37:06-04:00visakhttp://forum.gnatbox.com/account.php?u=767
Hello Everyone, Just to begin I am new to GTA products and got a GTA 1000 series and trying to log in the deivice via console or web which I coultd not. The device is working now and we used to log via WEB managment but now we could,t log via web due to some setting error which we may done by trying to set a rule (assuming port forwarding ..we set WAN IP address to LAN IP address but we did't set any port number .....) I tried to log in to the CONSOLE port using DB9 cable but no joy ... Can some give us some guide to solve the issue. The mistake was ...We set a rule Many thanks .
Just to begin I am new to GTA products and got a GTA 1000 series and trying to log in the deivice via console or web which I coultd not.
The device is working now and we used to log via WEB managment but now we could,t log via web due to some setting error which we may done by trying to set a rule (assuming port forwarding ..we set WAN IP address to LAN IP address but we did't set any port number .....)
I tried to log in to the CONSOLE port using DB9 cable but no joy ...
Can some give us some guide to solve the issue.
The mistake was ...We set a rule
Many thanks .]]>
Multiple gatewayshttp://forum.gnatbox.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=6072009-05-12T05:28:44-04:002009-05-12T08:22:19-04:00Johan449http://forum.gnatbox.com/account.php?u=247
Hi We have diverent routers for diverent lan segments on our network. IE: NIC1 (Protected Lan) routes its traffic via NIC2 (external) via Edge Router1 wich is connected directly to NIC2. NIC2 has public ip ending in .110 and Edge Router1 has a public ip ending in .109 NIC3 (Protected Lan) routes its traffic via NIC4 (external) via Edge Router2 wich is connected directly to NIC4. NIC4 has private IP ending in .2 and Edge Router2 has a private ip ending in .1 wich then NAT traffic to the internet. Can this be done in GB OS 5.2? and How??????????
We have diverent routers for diverent lan segments on our network. IE:
NIC1 (Protected Lan) routes its traffic via NIC2 (external) via Edge Router1 wich is connected directly to NIC2. NIC2 has public ip ending in .110 and Edge Router1 has a public ip ending in .109
NIC3 (Protected Lan) routes its traffic via NIC4 (external) via Edge Router2 wich is connected directly to NIC4. NIC4 has private IP ending in .2 and Edge Router2 has a private ip ending in .1 wich then NAT traffic to the internet.
Can this be done in GB OS 5.2? and How??????????]]>
Time Periods on OUTBOUND POLICIEShttp://forum.gnatbox.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=6022009-04-24T14:52:05-04:002009-05-05T05:04:39-04:00multisysidhttp://forum.gnatbox.com/account.php?u=196
I think it would be very very useful to be able to configure TIME PERIODS under OUTBOUND POLICIES. Right now it can be just configured on NAT tunnels. any idea when can this be configured!?
any idea when can this be configured!?]]>
Fatal Trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode while booting off the CD for installhttp://forum.gnatbox.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=5972009-04-07T14:51:37-04:002009-04-17T07:47:05-04:00savante21http://forum.gnatbox.com/account.php?u=752
We recently ugraded to GB OS 5.2 but it quickly caused our old ibm machine to lock up frequently sending it to 100% cpu utilization. I then read that the requirements for 5.2 were a bit heftier. While attempting to install the original gb OS cd-rom (4.0.1) onto a 2 GB CF card in a newer computer, we keep coming across the Fatal Trap 12 error mentioned in the subject. This fault is preceded by multiple ad0: read command timeout and ata0: resetting devices... messages. The new machine boots and runs GBOS 5.2 fine off a kingston 512mb CF card but the hardware requirements state it needs 1gb. I have tried both a San Disk 2GB and another Kingston 2GB card and both throw the same errors when attempting to boot off the CD to install 4.0.1. I have successfully booted off the CD with NO CF card installed as well as with the 512mb Kingston CF card, so I don't think it is the CD. I have tried turning UDMA mode on and off in the bios and it doesnt seem to affect anything. I have tried switching the voltage on the SYBA CF adapter from 3.3V to 5V with no luck. The bios correctly detects the CF card. Any ideas?
While attempting to install the original gb OS cd-rom (4.0.1) onto a 2 GB CF card in a newer computer, we keep coming across the Fatal Trap 12 error mentioned in the subject. This fault is preceded by multiple ad0: read command timeout and ata0: resetting devices... messages.
The new machine boots and runs GBOS 5.2 fine off a kingston 512mb CF card but the hardware requirements state it needs 1gb. I have tried both a San Disk 2GB and another Kingston 2GB card and both throw the same errors when attempting to boot off the CD to install 4.0.1.
I have successfully booted off the CD with NO CF card installed as well as with the 512mb Kingston CF card, so I don't think it is the CD.
I have tried turning UDMA mode on and off in the bios and it doesnt seem to affect anything. I have tried switching the voltage on the SYBA CF adapter from 3.3V to 5V with no luck. The bios correctly detects the CF card.
Any ideas?]]>
Route all traffic through VPNhttp://forum.gnatbox.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=5822009-04-01T18:20:52-04:002009-04-02T13:33:24-04:00siggehttp://forum.gnatbox.com/account.php?u=747
Hi Trying to make the VPN client to route all traffic through the vpn (force route) so there isnt any other open connection to the internet expect for the one i decied. Is it possible? Can i force the traffic to go out through the vpn client. Want the user to identify as a computer on my internal network at all times. Mobile client 4.51.001
Trying to make the VPN client to route all traffic through the vpn (force route) so there isnt any other open connection to the internet expect for the one i decied. Is it possible? Can i force the traffic to go out through the vpn client. Want the user to identify as a computer on my internal network at all times.